This post was rejected for the following reason(s):
Looks like you’re crossposting this from your blog elsewhere. That can be fine, but sometimes we we’ll reject these crossposts (or allow them but with a warning) if they seem like they’re not quite aimed at the LessWrong audience or adopting LessWrong norms. LessWrong has particular norms aimed at getting towards truth (e.g. avoiding rhetoric, being precise, being quantitative, etc), and your post isn't obviously displaying those. Good solutions to this are to (a) write an extra intro to your post to explain why people on LessWrong might find it interesting, (b) rewrite to be a style more aimed at truth than persuasiveness or engagingness.
Not obviously not spam / Language Model. Sometimes we get posts or comments that seem on the border between spam and not spam, or on the border of "not obviously a real human vs AI model)." Message us on intercom to convince us you're a real person (and, uh, please try to pass the turing test harder?)
consumer-facing applicationsTokens" (best vehicle is ERC20 & ERC721, not a dapps). 3. ability for user to Curate and get rewarded. We really need a dope prediction market that doesn't suck and fun to playLiquidity. Upcoming: highly liquid chains like Solana & Base. Challenges for building consumer onchain apps: aggregate liquidity & attention. For this, ppl would build publisher-exchanges, eg. unlonely